remote sensing
Article
Integrated Satellite System for Fire Detection and Prioritization
1 Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (IMAA), National Research Council (CNR), Tito Scalo,
85050 Potenza, Italy; giuseppe.mazzeo@imaa.cnr.it (G.M.); fortunato.desantis@imaa.cnr.it (F.D.S.);
alfredo.falconieri@imaa.cnr.it (A.F.); teodosio.lacava@imaa.cnr.it (T.L.); antonio.lanorte@imaa.cnr.it (A.L.);
francesco.marchese@imaa.cnr.it (F.M.); gabriele.nole@imaa.cnr.it (G.N.); nicola.pergola@imaa.cnr.it (N.P.);
and characterizing fire events as support to fire management activities. On the other hand, up
to now, only a few satellite-based platforms provide immediately and easily usable information
about events in progress, in terms of both hotspots, which identify and localize active fires, and
the danger conditions of the affected area. However, this kind of information is usually provided
through separated layers, without any synthetic indicator which, indeed, could be helpful, if timely
provided, for planning the priority of the intervention of firefighting resources in case of concurrent
fires. In this study, we try to fill these gaps by presenting an Integrated Satellite System (ISS) for fire
detection and prioritization, mainly based on the Robust Satellite Techniques (RST), and the Fire
Danger Dynamic Index (FDDI), an original re-structuration of the Índice Combinado de Risco de
Incêndio Florestal (ICRIF), for the first time presented here. The system, using Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), and
Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) data, provides near real-time integrated
information about both the fire presence and danger over the affected area. These satellite-based
products are generated in common formats, ready to be ingested in Geographic Information System
(GIS) technologies. Results shown and discussed here, on the occasion of concurrent winter and
summer fires in Italy, in agreement with information from independent sources, demonstrate that
the ISS system, operating at a regional/national scale, may provide an important contribution to fire
prioritization. This may result in the mitigation of fire impact in populated areas, infrastructures, and
the environment.
Keywords: satellite; early fire detection; fire danger; automatic near real-time system

  1. Introduction
    Wildfires are one of the most important causes of ecosystem degradation because of
    their strong impact on flora, fauna, and soils [ 1–3 ]. On a local scale, fires influence the soil
    structure, plant nutrition, composition, and competition among species. Burned areas are
    particularly sensitive to leaching nutrients and soil erosion, because of ensuing changes
    affecting hydrological processes [ 2]. Nowadays, wildfires represent a huge problem on
    a global scale. A large increase in the fire rate has been recorded globally, with social
    impacts including the loss of human life, and economic effects, such as damage to houses
    and infrastructures as well as impacts on the climate. Examples are the devastating fires
    occurring in 2019–2020 in Siberia [4–6], Australia [6–10], and South America [6,11–13].
    The huge economic and environmental damage directly or indirectly related to fires
    has constantly pushed the international space agencies (i.e., EUMETSAT, NASA) to better
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020335 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 2 of 25
    exploit satellite observations to detect fires, especially through sensors such as SEVIRI
    (Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager), AVHRR (Advanced Very High Resolu-
    tion Radiometer), MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer), and VIIRS
    (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite). The performance of those systems relies on the
    accuracy of algorithms used to detect thermal anomalies with a low false-positive rate. The
    pros and cons of the algorithms and systems used, including their potential in promptly
    alerting for fires, have been analyzed in recent studies (e.g., [14,15]).
    In addition, satellite remote sensing may provide information about a number of
    variables suited to evaluate fire danger ratings [16 – 18]. Danger estimations can be generally
    approached at two temporal scales: short-term and long-term (e.g., [ 19 – 21]). Long-term
    fire danger estimations provide information useful for management activities, and to plan
    prevention strategies. Short-term estimations are suited for operational activities during the
    fire emergency phase, for the management of fire-fighting resources, early detection, and
    timely attack on the flame front (for a state-of-art review see [19 – 21]). Those estimations
    require dynamic information updated daily (or even hourly) on the moisture content of
    the fuel, and additional meteorological parameters, such as temperature, relative humidity,
    wind, and precipitation. Moreover, fire danger is typically evaluated using static indices
    based on topography, fuel type, and load, which may be also derived from remote sensing
    data [21–23].
    However, up to now, only a few fire-monitoring systems provide additional infor-
    mation about fires and relative flame conditions as separated layers (e.g., meteorological
    fire danger maps, weather forecasts, fire perimeters, and susceptibility maps). Among
    these, it is worth mentioning some systems such as the European Forest Fire Informa-
    tion System (EFFIS, [ 24 ]), the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE, Brazilian
    Institute for Space Research [25 ]), the Advanced Fire Information System (AFIS, [ 26 , 27 ]),
    the FSI Fire Alerts System (FAST, [28 ,29 ]). The above-mentioned systems are generally
    modular web-based platforms at the global (AFIS), continental (INPE over South America,
    EFFIS over Europe), or sub-continental (FAST on India) scale. They allow end users to
    fully monitor forest fire activity by means of a series of separate modules, which aim at
    managing different aspects of fire contrast actions. The active fire detection is the basic
    module of these systems and may include hotspots only from polar satellite data (e.g.,
    in EFFIS and FAST) or both polar and geostationary satellite data (such as in INPE and
    AFIS). The availability of other modules (e.g., fire danger forecast, fire spread modeling,
    rapid damage assessment) may vary or differ in terms of spatial resolution according to
    the specific system. In all cases, end users may have considerable useful information in
    separated layers which may or may not be displayed, but there is no synthetic indicator for
    priority action against simultaneous fires. Apart from a few pioneering studies performing
    fire prioritization, which required assessment in the field (e.g., [ 30 ]), there are no systems
    combining/integrating satellite hotspot products and fire danger information to define
    priority levels, in operational fire contrast action. On the other hand, the above-mentioned
    systems are not generally useful for supporting firefighter activity which needs fire prod-
    ucts in real-time mode, i.e., frequently updated and delivered in a timely manner. This
    happens, for example, when hotspots are only provided from low-frequency overpass
    satellite sensors (e.g., polar orbiting) and/or fire danger products are only furnished daily.
    This issue is particularly significant in highly populated areas like the Italian territory.
    In this study, we fill these gaps by presenting a satellite-based system called the
    Integrated Satellite System (ISS), which combines fire detections in near real-time from
    satellite, through the RST-FIRES (Robust Satellite Techniques for FIRES detection and
    monitoring) algorithm [ 15 ], to an innovative index used to flag the most vulnerable areas,
    called the Fire Dynamic Danger Index (FDDI), developed for the prioritization of fire events
    in near real-time. In particular, FDDI is structured similarly to the Forest Fire Risk Combined
    Index (Índice Combinado de Risco de Incêndio Florestal–ICRIF, [31 ]), based on the Fire
    Weather Index (FWI) [32], which is updated every 24 h. FDDI, instead, is based on the
    Fuel Moisture Index (FMI) [33] which, unlike FWI, can be updated hourly. Moreover, two
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 3 of 25
    synthetic Priority Indicators (PINGEO and PINLEO) are proposed to immediately estimate
    the priority order of intervention. This system has been designed for rapid identification,
    localization, and danger characterization of active fires over the Italian territory, to support
    firefighting activities and fire management.
  2. Study Area
    The ISS system has been developed to perform over the entire Italian territory. Italy
    has two fire regimes: the winter regime, affecting the northern part of the country; and
    the summer regime which typically affects the central and southern regions. Drought and
    vegetative rest in regions characterized by the Mediterranean climate are the first factors
    affecting summer fires, while dry winds (i.e., Föen), combined with a general dryness of the
    vegetation are responsible for winter fires in alpine or alpine-like climate regions (e.g., [ 34 ]).
    Italian local regional authorities are responsible for extinguishing forest fires with the
    support of ground teams (Regional Forest Corps, National Fire Corps, volunteers, etc.),
    exploiting aerial regional resources (light and medium helicopters). Moreover, the national
    forest firefighting air fleet (Canadair aircraft and heavy helicopters) is operative through
    the Unified Air Operational Center (COAU), managed by the National Fire Corps [35]. In
    this work, we test the proposed system in the case of summer as well as winter fires, which
    always represent a challenge for satellite fire detection and monitoring due, for example, to
    critical weather conditions (i.e., frequent and dense cloud cover) [36].
  3. Data and Methods
    The final goal of the ISS system is to establish a suitable priority order of intervention
    in the case of concurrent fire events at large scale (e.g., for the Italian territory). To this
    end, different data, products, and information are integrated together as shown in Figure 1
    All these resources as well as the methods used for their analysis and integration will
    be described in the following sub-sections. In more detail, satellite data and products
    (Section 3.1.1) are automatically processed through the RST-FIRES (Section 3.2.1) algorithm
    to identify active fires. Weather forecasts (Section 3.1.2) are used to produce two dynamic
    indices, the Fire Danger Dynamic Index (FDDI, Section 3.2.2), depending on the health
    status of the vegetation, and the Wind Intensity (WI, Section 3.2.4), which is calculated for
    the same area. Geomorphology data (Section 3.1.3) are used to generate the Morphological
    Danger Index (MDI) (Section 3.2.3). Both WI and MDI are produced for polar-orbiting
    satellite data only (i.e., AVHRR and MODIS) offering data at higher spatial resolution
    (about 1 km) than those provided by geostationary platforms (i.e., SEVIRI). Two synthetic
    indicators, PINGEO and PINLEO (Section 6), are then built from the above-mentioned indices.
    In the following section, we describe the system inputs and the methodologies used.
    3.1. Data
    3.1.1. Satellit
  1. e Data and Products
    The ISS system has been developed for a prompt fire identification, exploiting high
    temporal resolution data, which are able to detect fires at their early stage and continu-
    ously monitor their evolution. ISS analyzes satellite data acquired in the Middle, Thermal
    InfraRed, and Visible bands (MIR, TIR, VIS) for this purpose. The system elaborates all
    96 daily observations from SEVIRI, aboard Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) geostation-
    ary satellites. SEVIRI provides data with a very high temporal sampling (15 min), but also
    with a rough spatial resolution (around 13–15 km2 at the considered latitudes). The ISS sys-
    tem also uses satellite data at a higher spatial resolution (1 km2), but with a lower frequency
    of observation (from 3 to 6 h) from AVHRR and MODIS, respectively, onboard the National
    Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/Meteorological Operational Satellites
    (MetOP) and the Earth Observing System (EOS). ISS runs operationally using satellite data
    directly acquired at the multi-mission receiving stations (EUMETCast and L+X-band direct
    readout antenna) operational at the Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 4 of 25
    of National Research Council (IMAA-CNR) and the School of Engineering of University of
    Basilicata (SI-UNIBAS).Remote Sens. 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of
    Figure 1. Integrated Satellite System scheme.
    3.1. Data
    3.1.1. Satellite Data and Products
    The ISS system has been developed for a prompt fire identification, exploiting hi
    temporal resolution data, which are able to detect fires at their early stage a
    continuously monitor their evolution. ISS analyzes satellite data acquired in the Midd
    Thermal InfraRed, and Visible bands (MIR, TIR, VIS) for this purpose. The syste
    elaborates all 96 daily observations from SEVIRI, aboard Meteosat Second Generati
    (MSG) geostationary satellites. SEVIRI provides data with a very high temporal sampli
    (15 min), but also with a rough spatial resolution (around 13–15 km2 at the consider
    latitudes). The ISS system also uses satellite data at a higher spatial resolution (1 km2 ), b
    with a lower frequency of observation (from 3 to 6 h) from AVHRR and MOD
    respectively, onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrati
    (NOAA)/Meteorological Operational Satellites (MetOP) and the Earth Observing Syste
    (EOS). ISS runs operationally using satellite data directly acquired at the multi-missi
    receiving stations (EUMETCast and L+X-band direct readout antenna) operational at t
    Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis of National Research Coun
    (IMAA-CNR) and the School of Engineering of University of Basilicata (SI-UNIBAS).
    The system analyzes fire danger in terms of the health status of the vegetation. F
    this purpose, it implements the EUMETSAT NDVD product (ND VI Decadal, [37]) f
    SEVIRI, and the Copernicus 10-day NDVI product for MODIS and AVHRR da
    ta [38]. T
    NDVD is a decadal aggregated product based on the daily SEVIRI NDVI. Aggregation
    made for days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 up to the last day of each month. This produ
    widely used to characterize vegetation density and vigor as well as to identify vegetati
    stress and drought, is distributed by EUMETSAT at the SEVIRI pixel spatial resolutio
    together with the raw data. For AVHRR and MODIS, ISS uses the Copernicus Glob
    Land Service NDVI product. This product is based on the Maximum Value Compos
    (MVC) of NDVI, computed over a 10-day period, considering the SPOT/VEGETATIO
    C3 and PROBA-V C1 satellite data, which are atmospherically corrected and cloud-fr
    The used product is distributed at the 1 km resolution within three days of the end of t
    Figure 1. Integrated Satellite System scheme.
    The system analyzes fire danger in terms of the health status of the vegetation. For
    this purpose, it implements the EUMETSAT NDVD product (NDVI Decadal, [37]) for
    SEVIRI, and the Copernicus 10-day NDVI product for MODIS and AVHRR data [38 ]. The
    NDVD is a decadal aggregated product based on the daily SEVIRI NDVI. Aggregation
    is made for days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 up to the last day of each month. This product,
    widely used to characterize vegetation density and vigor as well as to identify vegetation
    stress and drought, is distributed by EUMETSAT at the SEVIRI pixel spatial resolution,
    together with the raw data. For AVHRR and MODIS, ISS uses the Copernicus Global Land
    Service NDVI product. This product is based on the Maximum Value Composite (MVC)
    of NDVI, computed over a 10-day period, considering the SPOT/VEGETATION C3 and
    PROBA-V C1 satellite data, which are atmospherically corrected and cloud-free. The used
    product is distributed at the 1 km resolution within three days of the end of the aggregation
    period. Moreover, to characterize fire danger in terms of fuel danger (FD), level three of the
    CORINE (Coordination of Information on the Environment) Land Cover 2012 (CLC2012)
    map is used.
    3.1.2. Weather Forecast
    Air temperature, humidity, and wind are key parameters for fire predisposition condi-
    tions. They are considered using weather forecasts generated by the COSMO (Consortium
    for Small-scale Modeling) meteorological model [39]. We included the forecast from the
    LAMI application (Limited Area Model Italy) in the system. As part of the LAMI agree-
    ment, Cosmo 5M operational chain provides numerical forecasts on the Mediterranean
    area, with a grid of 5 km. The model processes twice a day, at 00 and 12 GMT, and makes
    forecasts for a time horizon of three days (72 h), although only 25 h are stored. The two
    sets of weather forecasts are always available for each hour of the day. ISS integrates
    only the 00 GMT set of forecasts (very similar to 12 GMT as reported in Figure 2), storing
    12 GMT as a backup solution, for time computation saving. These products are distributed
    in GRIB (GRIdded Binary) format and contain 17 information layers (regarding pressure,
    geopotential, temperature, wind, albedo, precipitation, snow). To determine the FDDI,
    the ISS system automatically extracts both temperature (T2m) and dew point temperature
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 5 of 25
    (Td2m) generated at 2 m above ground, and the u and v components of the wind, provided
    at 10 m above the ground.GMT, and makes forecasts for a time horizon of three days (72 h), although only 25 h are
    stored. The two sets of weather forecasts are always available for each hour of the day.
    ISS integrates only the 00 GMT set of forecasts (very similar to 12 GMT as reported in
    Figure 2), storing 12 GMT as a backup solution, for time computation saving. These
    products are distributed in GRIB (GRIdded Binary) format and contain 17 information
    layers (regarding pressure, geopotential, temperature, wind, albedo, precipitation,
    snow). To determine the FDDI, the ISS system automatically extracts both temperature
    (T2m) and dew point temperature (Td 2m) generated at 2 m above ground, and the u and v
    components of the wind, provided at 10 m above the ground.
    Figure 2. (a) Transect AB of about 120 km. (b) Temperature trend observed along with the transect
    AB for 25 October 2018, 13:00 GMT forecast at 00 GMT (red line) and 12 GMT (green line). It is
    worth noting that the trend of both the curves is similar; the difference never exceeds about 1.5 °C.
    3.1.3. Geomorphology Data
    To consider the possible “fire accelerating factors” due to the morphology of the
    territory, ISS uses a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) with a resolution of 20 m. Although this
    layer (in terms of slope and aspect) has an immediate impact on fire dynamics, it was
    upscaled only at the spatial resolution of MODIS and AVHRR (1 km). Indeed, no
    upscaling procedure was performed for SEVIRI due to its low spatial resolution, and
    consequently, no MDI was generated.
    3.2. Methods Implemented and Indices Developed
    3.2.1. The RST-FIRES Methodology
    The ISS system implements the RST-FIRES algorithm [15] to detect and monitor
    fires. This approach was successfully used to detect thermal anomalies related to both
    winter (e.g., [36,40]) and summer fires (e.g., [15,41–44]), in different operational contexts.
    RST-FIRES is a specific configuration of the RST multi-temporal approach [45–47], which
    requires: (i) characterization of the satellite signal under unperturbed conditions; and (ii)
    identification of anomalous signals through an automatic change detection scheme. In
    particular, RST considers “anomalous” a signal that significantly diverges from the
    “normal” condition (i.e., expected value), which is typical of the site and observation
    time. The normal unperturbed condition can be defined using multi-annual time series
    of satellite records. The ALICE (Absolutely Llocal Index of Change of the Environment,
    [45–47]) index detects perturbing events:
    Figure 2. (a) Transect AB of about 120 km. (b) Temperature trend observed along with the transect
    AB for 25 October 2018, 13:00 GMT forecast at 00 GMT (red line) and 12 GMT (green line). It is worth
    noting that the trend of both the curves is similar; the difference never exceeds about 1.5 ◦C.
    3.1.3. Geomorphology Data
    To consider the possible “fire accelerating factors” due to the morphology of the
    territory, ISS uses a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) with a resolution of 20 m. Although
    this layer (in terms of slope and aspect) has an immediate impact on fire dynamics, it was
    upscaled only at the spatial resolution of MODIS and AVHRR (1 km). Indeed, no upscaling
    procedure was performed for SEVIRI due to its low spatial resolution, and consequently,
    no MDI was generated.
    3.2. Methods Implemented and Indices Developed
    3.2.1. The RST-FIRES Methodology
    The ISS system implements the RST-FIRES algorithm [ 15 ] to detect and monitor
    fires. This approach was successfully used to detect thermal anomalies related to both
    winter (e.g., [36, 40]) and summer fires (e.g., [15 ,41 – 44 ]), in different operational contexts.
    RST-FIRES is a specific configuration of the RST multi-temporal approach [ 45 –47 ], which
    requires: (i) characterization of the satellite signal under unperturbed conditions; and
    (ii) identification of anomalous signals through an automatic change detection scheme.
    In particular, RST considers “anomalous” a signal that significantly diverges from the
    “normal” condition (i.e., expected value), which is typical of the site and observation time.
    The normal unperturbed condition can be defined using multi-annual time series of satellite
    records. The ALICE (Absolutely Llocal Index of Change of the Environment, [ 45 – 47]) index
    detects perturbing events:
    ⊗V (x, y, t) = [V(x, y, t) − μV(x, y)]
    σV(x, y) (1)
    where V(x,y,t) is the signal observed at time t in a single spectral band or a band combination
    at the pixel (x,y); μV(x,y) is the expected value (temporal mean) of the signal, while σV(x,y)
    is the temporal standard deviation. Those terms are computed by analyzing homogenous
    cloud-free satellite records acquired at the same time of day and period of the year (same
    month). The frequency/intensity of fires in the used time-series may possibly contaminate
    μV(x,y) and σV(x,y) values; a kσ-clipping procedure such as that described in [15, 45] is
    applied to exclude corresponding V(x,y,t) values from the reference field computation.
    Therefore, the ALICE index quantifies the signal excess of V(x,y,t) in reference to
    the mean value μch(x,y), weighted by its natural variability σch(x,y). Since fires emit
    the maximum of thermal radiation in the MIR region (3–5 μm), the ALICEMIR index
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 6 of 25
    analyzing the brightness temperature (BT) measured in the MIR channel of used sensors
    (V(x,y,t) = BTMIR(x,y,t)) is computed by RST-FIRES to detect fires. A wide description of
    the RST-FIRES methodology, including the other indices that are used to timely detect fires
    at an early stage, can be found in previous studies (e.g., [15,36,40]).
    3.2.2. The Fire Danger Dynamic Index
    The Fire Danger Dynamic Index is an indicator based on a conceptual multiscale
    model, which combines satellite-derived indices. FDDI, whose performance is evaluated in
    Appendix A, is a dynamic fire hazard index, which analyzes the fuel characteristics and
    state of the vegetation. This index is updated hourly, to analyze changes in the weather
    parameters during the day. It is calculated for each pixel of satellite imagery and integrates
    both structural and meteorological indices:
    • Fuel Moisture Index (FMI), derived from meteorological forecast data;
    • NDVD index (decadal value of NDVI);
    • Fuel Danger (FD).
    Figure 3 shows a synthetic scheme.Therefore, the ALICE index quantifies the signal excess of V(x,y,t) in reference to
    mean value μ ch(x,y), weighted by its natural variability σch(x,y). Since fires emit
    maximum of thermal radiation in the MIR region (3–5 μm), the ALICE MIR index analyz
    the brightness temperature (BT) measured in the MIR channel of used sensors (V(x,y,
    BTMIR(x,y,t)) is computed by RST-FIRES to detect fires. A wide description of
    RST-FIRES methodology, including the other indices that are used to timely detect fi
    at an early stage, can be found in previous studies (e.g., [15,36,40]).
    3.2.2. The Fire Danger Dynamic Index
    The Fire Danger Dynamic Index is an indicator based on a conceptual multisc
    model, which combines satellite-derived indices. FDDI, whose performance is evalua
    in Appendix A, is a dynamic fire hazard index, which analyzes the fuel characterist
    and state of the vegetation. This index is updated hourly, to analyze changes in
    weather parameters during the day. It is calculated for each pixel of satellite imagery a
    integrates both structural and meteorological indices:
    • Fuel Moisture Index (FMI), derived from meteorological forecast data;
    • NDVD index (decadal value of NDVI);
    • Fuel Danger (FD).
    Figure 3 shows a synthetic scheme.
    Figure 3. Fire Danger Dynamic Index scheme.
    The latter is derived from CLC2012 and resampled for each satellite sensor (AVHR
    MODIS, and SEVIRI). Its values are indicative of the hazard associated with each kind
    Figure 3. Fire Danger Dynamic Index scheme.
    The latter is derived from CLC2012 and resampled for each satellite sensor (AVHRR,
    MODIS, and SEVIRI). Its values are indicative of the hazard associated with each kind of
    land cover and can be updated based on the latest available land use maps. Each pixel
    is represented by a vector with 38 elements indicating the fraction area occupied by each
    CLC class (Ak). The fuel map was generated by associating a hazard level to each class
    (Dk, [31]), as reported in Table 1.
    Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 335 7 of 25
    Table 1. Level 3 of the CLC classes that are associated with the hazard level Dk.
    K CLC CODE CLC CLASS (Ak) Hazard Level (Dk)
    1 111 Continuous urban fabric 1
    2 112 Discontinuous urban fabric 1
    3 121 Industrial or commercial units 1
    4 122 Road and rail networks and associated land 1
    5 123 Port areas 1
    6 124 Airports 1
    7 131 Mineral extraction sites 1
    8 132 Dump sites 1
    9 133 Construction sites 1
    10 141 Green urban areas 1
    11 142 Sport and leisure facilities 1
    12 211 Non-irrigated arable land 10
    13 212 Permanently irrigated land 5
    14 213 Rice fields 1
    15 221 Vineyards 1
    16 222 Fruit trees and berry plantations 1
    17 223 Olive groves 5
    18 231 Pastures 10
    19 241 Annual crops associated with permanent crops 7
    20 242 Complex cultivation patterns 10
    21 243 Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Best Way Traders | Copyright © All Rights Reserved. | Theme: Business Kid by eVisionThemes
Best Way Traders (Pvt.) Ltd.